From: mds@paradyne.com (Mark Studebaker) Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:23:33 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] 1/4 WIP I2C kernel patches-config Message-Id: <3CEC0E8D.B1CFCEFE@paradyne.com> List-Id: References: <3CE20AD5.5554A03@bellsouth.net> In-Reply-To: <3CE20AD5.5554A03@bellsouth.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org If it doesn't work in 2.5 we shouldn't include it in a 2.5 patch. Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 08:14:31PM -0400, Mark D. Studebaker wrote: > > > - Don't submit patches for anything not patched by mkpatch, > > that is, anything not in mkpatch/FILES. This includes *8xx* and > > *405*. The 405 stuff, I have a monster patch I got a month and > > a half ago, the only reason I haven't put it in yet is that it > > renames all the files. But anyway, if it isn't in mkpatch/FILES > > there's some reason. i2c-pcf-epp is really new. 8xx status unclear. > > While the 4xx stuff is out of date, in the next round of patches, feel > free to include the 8xx driver. It hasn't been tested in a bit, but > 8xx doesn't currently work in 2.5 right now anyways. I'll attempt to > test it out on 2.4 soon. > > -- > Tom Rini (TR1265) > http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/