From: Hans Reiser Date: Wed May 18 19:56:34 2005 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] Re: [RFC] [PATCH] OCFS2 In-Reply-To: <20050518223303.GE1340@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> References: <20050518223303.GE1340@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> Message-ID: <428BD137.1020200@namesys.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Mark Fasheh Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, wim.coekaerts@oracle.com, lmb@suse.de Mark Fasheh wrote: >In case there is any concern about code size, a quick comparison shows >the file system and cluster stacks combined size to be not >significantly larger than reiserfs and 1/3 the size of xfs. > > > I too am quick to cite XFS when anyone complains about the code size of anything we write.;-) Congrats on getting a filesystem to start to work, I know how long that road is, and best of luck to you all, Hans