From: Pavel Fedin Subject: Re: [PATCH] Full NLS support for HFS (classic) filesystem Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 17:44:22 -0400 Message-ID: <42A4C3B6.8080006@rambler.ru> References: <429B1E35.2040905@rambler.ru> <429C68A0.20003@rambler.ru> <429CBC75.2030605@rambler.ru> <429CD545.1070308@rambler.ru> <1117550958.8073.30.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> <429F0AF1.5060705@rambler.ru> <1117704266.11696.5.camel@imp.csi.cam.ac.uk> <42A05C6E.3000301@rambler.ru> <42A44C8A.2000906@rambler.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mxb.rambler.ru ([81.19.66.30]:13318 "EHLO mxb.rambler.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261414AbVFFNnN (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2005 09:43:13 -0400 To: Roman Zippel In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Roman Zippel wrote: > No, the dynamic table is not acceptable within the HFS code. > Do whatever you want in a separate nls module. Well, it's really bad that you say so IMHO. But it's just my opinion. In fact, i agree, probably i'm alone who uses HFS in Russia so this is only my problem and you don't want to take care about the minority of users. In this case i can just say "ok" about integrating your version of the patch (which you already presented here). I will test 2.6.12 with it when it becomes stable and probably introduce another NLS module which will actually make this working for me. I see no sense in mere duplication of your work. -- Kind regards, Pavel Fedin