From: Manfred Spraul Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 19:59:55 +0000 Subject: [KJ] Re: [PATCH 4/8] Cleanup kmem_cache_create() Message-Id: <437103BB.2000209@colorfullife.com> List-Id: References: <436FF51D.8080509@us.ibm.com> <436FF70D.6040604@us.ibm.com> <52mzkfrily.fsf@cisco.com> <4370F6BB.1070409@us.ibm.com> <4370FA9F.6010800@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <4370FA9F.6010800@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Matthew Dobson Cc: Christoph Lameter , Roland Dreier , kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org, Pekka J Enberg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Matthew Dobson wrote: >Manfred, any reason not to name this constant in slab.c? If there's a good >reason not to, I'm perfectly happy to leave it alone. :) > > > No, there is no reason. It's debug-only code, thus I was too lazy to create a constant. And no - don't make me maintainer of slab.c. I didn't even have enough time to review the numa patches properly. -- Manfred _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors