From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: [NETFILTER 00/22]: Netfilter update for 2.6.22
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 00:14:25 +0100
Message-ID: <45F881D1.3010701@trash.net>
References: <20070314084946.15282.58609.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>
	<20070314.160559.74747185.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070314.160559.74747185.davem@davemloft.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/netfilter-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org

David Miller wrote:
> I have two major merges to do today, one large set from Arnaldo with
> more skb data access refinements, and this netfilter set.
> 
> What I'm going to do is merge Arnaldo's first, then your's.
> 
> The logic is that it's easier for me to fix conflicts in your
> patch set (since it largely just removes code) than the other
> way around.

Thanks. I had a quick look at Arnaldo's patches and think there
shouldn't be any conflicts, but if there are, just let me know
and I'll go over it afterwards.