From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [patch] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 07:33:32 -0700 Message-ID: <471E063C.4020204@goop.org> References: <471C1A61.1010001@goop.org> <471CEEB4.9040807@goop.org> <20071022190740.GA1695@one.firstfloor.org> <20071022223224.GC995458@sgi.com> <20071022233514.GA9057@one.firstfloor.org> <20071023003641.GF995458@sgi.com> <20071023070414.GM66820511@sgi.com> <20071023093035.GB24536@one.firstfloor.org> <20071023124137.GP66820511@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20071023124137.GP66820511@sgi.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Chinner Cc: Andi Kleen , dean gaudet , Nick Piggin , Xen-devel , Morten@suse.de, Linux Kernel Mailing List , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?B=F8geskov?= , xfs@oss.sgi.com, xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, Mark Williamson List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org David Chinner wrote: > Nick, Jeremy, (others?) any objections to this approach to solve > the problem? Seems sounds in principle. I think Nick's shootdown-stray-mappings mm API call is a better long-term answer, but this will do for now. I'll test it out today. J