From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: avoid LOCK prefix where possible Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:09:13 +0000 Message-ID: <475D2C69.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> References: <475D141B.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> Keir Fraser 10.12.07 11:50 >>> >If these are changed in upstream then I'll pull the changes down. I don;t >think any of these extra LOCK prefixes are on critical paths. Could you take the changes to xen/arch/x86/hvm/vlapic.c and xen/arch/x86/traps.c then at least? These look like they could be used on (kernel) critical paths. Jan