Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1J3xOM-0002Bv-9q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 12:35:06 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1J3xOK-00028V-LW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 12:35:05 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J3xOK-00028N-HY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 12:35:04 -0500
Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([63.81.120.158])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <akuster@kama-aina.net>) id 1J3xOK-0004Mt-DE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 12:35:04 -0500
Received: from pahoa.hi.kama-aina.net (unknown [10.235.20.2])
	by hermes.mvista.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73551EDE1
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 09:35:00 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <476561C4.7040806@kama-aina.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 07:35:00 -1000
From: Armin <akuster@kama-aina.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Patch 1/2v2][PXA27x] initial keypad support
References: <47609EF8.6020606@kama-aina.net>
	<fb249edb0712160421s777b587bvb86fe935687af1a6@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <fb249edb0712160421s777b587bvb86fe935687af1a6@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

andrzej zaborowski wrote:
> On 13/12/2007, Armin <akuster@kama-aina.net> wrote:
>   
>> Hello,
>> Here is a new series of keypad support patches for the PXA27x.
>> I believe I have addressed all the concerns from my first set of patch.
>>     
>
> Thanks! I just changed the use of cpu_abort to an exit() because
> cpu_single_env will typically be NULL at the time of initialisation.
> Please test.
> Cheers
>   

Andrzej,

It works fine.

Thanks.
-Armin