Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m41IcnH5032589 for ; Thu, 1 May 2008 14:38:49 -0400 Received: from smtp04.atlngahp.sys.nuvox.net (smtp-out4.atlngahp.sys.nuvox.net [70.43.63.22]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m41IcbK8023341 for ; Thu, 1 May 2008 14:38:37 -0400 Received: from smtp.media-brokers.com (70.43.81.99.nw.nuvox.net [70.43.81.99]) by smtp04.atlngahp.sys.nuvox.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m41IcW0G006682 for ; Thu, 1 May 2008 14:38:32 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.110] (sjester.atl.media-brokers.com [192.168.1.110]) by smtp.media-brokers.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79B3B37B160 for ; Thu, 1 May 2008 14:38:32 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <481A0E28.5030108@Media-Brokers.com> Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 14:38:32 -0400 From: Charles Marcus MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] F7 will not boot after running backup w/snapshot References: <4817C2FD.1010909@verizon.net> <4817D97D.8060805@verizon.net> <4817ECAF.4020806@verizon.net> <48187B91.4060901@verizon.net> <1c748a490804300809s304f7fdfx55aeb0fd9c6cc7ab@mail.gmail.com> <4818AB1C.9030809@verizon.net> <4818BA5D.6070501@Media-Brokers.com> <4818D59A.8020906@verizon.net> <4818E262.4070105@redhat.com> <4818F2FC.5050907@verizon.net> <20080501154800.GA5941@us.ibm.com> <481A08A7.5010305@verizon.net> In-Reply-To: <481A08A7.5010305@verizon.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: LVM general discussion and development On 5/1/2008 2:15 PM, Gerry Reno wrote: > Why? What value is the old snapshot at this point? ? It holds all of the changes to your original (snapshotted) volume, so I imagine it would be pretty important to most people? I'm not really understanding all the inner-workings of LVM, but now I can see why using a ram disk for an LVM snapshot might not be a very good idea for this one reason - it won't survive a reboot... > You just had a system reboot in the middle of a snapshotted backup so > all you need to do is get the system up, redo another snapshot and > retake your backup. I'm not interested in the old snapshot. I would be... but thats just me... -- Best regards, Charles