From: James Chapman Subject: Re: Wired behaviour with IPv6 over PPP Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 11:46:04 +0100 Message-ID: <4836A06C.2050301@katalix.com> References: <48341C0B.7010003@interway.ch> <20080522014959.0f6191aa.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <48354318.60202@katalix.com> <4835C40B.60603@interway.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Matthias Cramer Return-path: Received: from s36.avahost.net ([74.53.95.194]:51115 "EHLO s36.avahost.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751761AbYEWKqR (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2008 06:46:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4835C40B.60603@interway.ch> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Matthias Cramer wrote: > James Chapman wrote: >> Did this work with previous kernel versions? > > No, in my opinion it never worked. But I thought that pppd does it wrong > because id never got an IPv6 address. But I had always forwarding > enabled. Now in this case i started pppd without forwarding enabled and > got an address. > >> Does pppd log any errors? > > No, no errors Could you post a pppd debug log showing the ppp protocol exchange with the peer in the failing case? It might give some clues. -- James Chapman Katalix Systems Ltd http://www.katalix.com Catalysts for your Embedded Linux software development