From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Paravirtual spinlocks Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 22:28:15 -0700 Message-ID: <4872FAEF.9070508@goop.org> References: <20080707190749.299430659@goop.org> <200807081029.19242.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <200807081451.43433.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200807081451.43433.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Nick Piggin Cc: Jens Axboe , Xen devel , Peter Zijlstra , Christoph Lameter , Rusty Russell , Petr Tesarik , LKML , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Thomas Friebel , Ingo Molnar List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Nick Piggin wrote: > What's lguest's solution? > Uniprocessor only. J