From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] module_refcounting and anonymous inodes Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:51:07 +0200 Message-ID: <493E3F8B.7070603@redhat.com> References: <200812021114.59050.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <200812081251.14648.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <493D0B9A.9000401@redhat.com> <200812091743.26586.sheng@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Christian Borntraeger , LKML To: Sheng Yang Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:33302 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753395AbYLIJwd (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2008 04:52:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200812091743.26586.sheng@linux.intel.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Sheng Yang wrote: > Should we push the first patch to 2.6.28? It's not a recent regression, so no. > I got some trouble with the separate > 2nd patch, for I am using Linus' tree and make KVM as modules, so the > reference count reduced to negative now... (Oh Avi, I know you suggest to use > in kernel rather than modules, but module is indeed convenient. :) ) > Right, that would affect everyone. What we need is to hack the second patch for external modules on <2.6.29. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function