Message-ID: <4BD9410D.3070909@...1114...> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:19:25 +0200 From: David Sommerseth MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20100429070322.GW12312@...1296...> <4BD93D4B.5050601@...1114...> <20100429080838.GZ12312@...1296...> In-Reply-To: <20100429080838.GZ12312@...1296...> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] TAP interface support for Solaris/OpenSolaris List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Gert Doering Cc: openvpn-devel , Kazuyoshi Aizawa -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 29/04/10 10:08, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:03:23AM +0200, David Sommerseth wrote: >>> If we include it in feat_ipv6_payload, it won't have merge conflicts - but >>> then you only get the TAP-on-Solaris in combination with all the IPv6 stuff, >>> which people might not want. >>> >>> David? >> >> You seem to have pretty well good control over this TUN/TAP >> infrastructure. So I have no problems with you pulling whatever you >> find useful into your IPv6 branch, which covers this. > > OK, if nobody objects, I'll integrate the rest of these patches into > "my" tun.c, and commit to the IPv6 payload branch. (Will take a few > days...) > > If someone urgently needs TAP support for Solaris later on, but refuses > to use the IPv6 stuff, we can still sort out what to do then. Agreed! And I really struggle to see this being a reality, unless the IPv6 branch got stability issues for IPv4 only users. Which I can't say is an issue now. Send me a PULL REQUEST when you're ready, and I'll get it into allmerged after ACK. kind regards, David Sommerseth -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkvZQQ0ACgkQDC186MBRfroX0QCeL1nQ61nh+MDY1l0YUsS0gsQ0 D58AmgNK+LWCqJSNGzCeFh8QgouMdlXi =no9p -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----