From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH][v2 3/3] KVM: x86: Use FPU API Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 12:37:29 +0300 Message-ID: <4BF10E59.1090200@redhat.com> References: <1274087308-26676-1-git-send-email-sheng@linux.intel.com> <1274087308-26676-4-git-send-email-sheng@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Sheng Yang Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1274087308-26676-4-git-send-email-sheng@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 05/17/2010 12:08 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > Convert KVM to use generic FPU API. > > void kvm_load_guest_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > if (vcpu->guest_fpu_loaded) > @@ -5156,7 +5134,7 @@ void kvm_load_guest_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > vcpu->guest_fpu_loaded = 1; > unlazy_fpu(current); > - kvm_fx_restore(&vcpu->arch.guest_fx_image); > + fpu_restore_checking(&vcpu->arch.guest_fpu); > trace_kvm_fpu(1); > } > Do we need to do something on error here? I think an error can only occur if userspace sets bad fpu state, so maybe do the check in the ioctl. In any case, unrelated to this patch. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.