From: Tilman Schmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] ISDN patches for 2.6.36 Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 09:47:20 +0200 Message-ID: <4C32DF88.8080702@imap.cc> References: <20100705-patch-gigaset-00.tilman@imap.cc> <20100705.185352.39176355.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0C48899CCE24D265C58CF33D" Cc: isdn@linux-pingi.de, hjlipp@web.de, keil@b1-systems.de, i4ldeveloper@listserv.isdn4linux.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100705.185352.39176355.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0C48899CCE24D265C58CF33D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 2010-07-06 03:53 schrieb David Miller: > From: Tilman Schmidt > Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 02:18:32 +0200 (CEST) >=20 >> Karsten, David, >> >> following are a series of patches to the Gigaset driver I'd like >> to see included in kernel release 2.6.36. >=20 > Do they have any dependencies on the two patch set of fixes > you just sent out for net-2.6? None. They are completely independent. I guess your question arose because I gave both series the same title by mistake. The second one should have been called: "*Gigaset* patches for 2.6.36". Thanks, Tilman --------------enig0C48899CCE24D265C58CF33D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkwy35IACgkQQ3+did9BuFsRDQCfd3yNkqAglqIYCnLz4kohO3Oa w2AAnirKFQMMxQclohUKwBuz5pDp2Cc4 =efCV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0C48899CCE24D265C58CF33D--