From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: hold mm->page_table_lock while doing vmalloc_sync Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:26:30 -0700 Message-ID: <4CC0B006.7040008@zytor.com> References: <4CB76E8B.2090309@goop.org> <4CC0AB73.8060609@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4CC0AB73.8060609@goop.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: "Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , the arch/x86 maintainers , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jan Beulich , Ian Campbell List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 10/21/2010 02:06 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Ping? Have you had any thoughts about possible x86-64 problems with this? > > Thanks, > J I didn't find any, so I already committed your patch to tip:x86/mm two days ago. Now, it's worth noting that Linus has asked us to get rid of vmalloc_sync_all() completely, which would be a good thing in the longer term. -hpa