From: Jens Scharsig <js_at_ng@scharsoft.de>
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 22:11:57 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [STATUS: AT91/AVR32]
In-Reply-To: <4D5162B4.50606@emk-elektronik.de>
References: <4D5162B4.50606@emk-elektronik.de>
Message-ID: <4D51B19D.2080600@scharsoft.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Am 08.02.2011 16:35, schrieb Reinhard Meyer:
> Hello AT91/AVR32 users and maintainers,
> 
> since relocation was introduced most ARM boards and therefore all AT91 based boards are
> inherently broken.
> 
> We also used this "opportunity" to rework most of the AT91 include files mess.
> 
> You can find the current efforts at git.denx.de/u-boot-atmel.git, branch rework110202.
> 
Dear Reinhard Meyer,

I am maintainer of eb_cpux9k2 board and if you now do the soc rework 2009.

Currently the arm920t/at91 are not touched by your rework.

I can try to update the at91rm9200.h to the atmel_xxxx name scheme and update 
the two board in arm920t/at91 tree including drivers. 
Maybe I can still send a patch this week.

But I can't test the at91rm9200ek.

A second problem is, both boards use the legacy at91rm9200 usart driver. So we could try 
to use the  atmel_usart in a second step.


best regards 


Jens Scharsig