Message-ID: <4E0C589B.8080702@...515...> Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:06:03 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?U2FtdWxpIFNlcHDDpG5lbg==?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1309335848-14414-1-git-send-email-samuli@...515...> <1309420750-26524-1-git-send-email-samuli@...515...> <4E0C3D87.6050407@...68...> In-Reply-To: <4E0C3D87.6050407@...68...> Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] [PATCH] Fixes to easy-rsa/2.0 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: Matthias Andree Cc: "openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" > Am 30.06.2011 09:59, schrieb samuli@...515...: >> From: Samuli Sepp=C3=A4nen >> >> As support for OpenSSL 1.0.0 requires a modified openssl.cnf file, it was >> decided to rename openssl.cnf to openssl-1.0.0.cnf for clarity and better >> support of different OpenSSL versions. The old openssl.cnf was renamed as >> openssl-0.9.8.cnf. > But: Whence the need to keep support for 0.9.6? We'll ask James about that in today's meeting: I don't see any reason why OpenSSL 0.9.6 should be supported: it's last maintenance release was made in 2004. --=20 Samuli Sepp=C3=A4nen Community Manager OpenVPN Technologies, Inc irc freenode net: mattock