From: b-cousson@ti.com (Cousson, Benoit) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 02:32:12 +0200 Subject: [RFC PATCH 07/10] documentation/dt: Add spinlock bindings In-Reply-To: <20110908181001.GF2967@ponder.secretlab.ca> References: <1314191356-10963-1-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com> <1314191356-10963-8-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com> <20110908181001.GF2967@ponder.secretlab.ca> Message-ID: <4E695E8C.10505@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 9/8/2011 8:10 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 03:09:13PM +0200, Benoit Cousson wrote: >> Add documentation for the HW spinlock in OMAP4. >> >> Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson >> Cc: Randy Dunlap >> --- >> .../bindings/hwspinlock/omap-spinlock.txt | 5 +++++ >> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwspinlock/omap-spinlock.txt >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwspinlock/omap-spinlock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwspinlock/omap-spinlock.txt >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..36ac074 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwspinlock/omap-spinlock.txt >> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ >> +HW spinlock on OMAP platform: >> + >> +Required properties: >> +- compatible : Must be "ti,omap-spinlock"; > > "ti,omap-*" is probably too generic. omap3-spinlock or omap4-spinlock > would be better. For that IP, we do not have any real IP version documented, so I do agree. Since it is a new OMAP4 IP, I'll use omap4-spinlock. Benoit