From: Zefir Kurtisi Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:21:37 +0200 Subject: [ath9k-devel] [RFC 3/6] ath9k: initial radar pulse detection for DFS In-Reply-To: References: <1317637758-11907-1-git-send-email-zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com> <1317637758-11907-4-git-send-email-zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com> <4E89A941.8060208@neratec.com> Message-ID: <4E89C4F1.2090708@neratec.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org On 10/03/2011 02:43 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 3 October 2011 20:23, Zefir Kurtisi wrote: > >> There might be one, but I left it out (for now) for the sake of simplicity. >> >> I anyhow doubt it has a practical relevance, since the pulse width is reported with usec granularity and therefore a scaling factor of 1/811 vs. 1/800 has no impact on the re-scaled value for widths up to 50 usecs. > > I just remember this was a sticking point when porting the fusion code > to FreeBSD. > Without that particular fix, some of the radar patterns didn't > actually match reliably. > > It's possible it doesn't matter as much for your classification code. > I'm just bringing it up to be complete. :) > > > > Adrian Thanks! Most probably it'll end being added to the lengthy TODO list. Zefir