From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V4 09/10] x86/jump_label: use GENERIC_NOP5_ATOMIC
 instead of jmp5 +0
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:40:42 -0700
Message-ID: <4E97067A.2070305@zytor.com>
References: <cover.1318464169.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> <34ede5db1571d541a5c3fc49923bb353a37dd431.1318464413.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <34ede5db1571d541a5c3fc49923bb353a37dd431.1318464413.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>, Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>, Jan Glauber <jang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>, Xen Devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 10/12/2011 05:08 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
> 
> GENERIC_NOP5_ATOMIC should make a better nop.
> 

On 32 bits, yes.  On 64 bits you should use P6_NOP5_ATOMIC.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.