From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V4 10/10] jump-label: initialize jump-label subsystem much earlier Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 10:56:00 -0700 Message-ID: <4EA6F830.7010304@goop.org> References: <1318502628.24856.10.camel@twins> <4E98AEDD.4010503@goop.org> <1318668158.6594.0.camel@twins> <4E9A38FA.7030504@goop.org> <1318935720.21167.15.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1318935720.21167.15.camel@twins> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Steven Rostedt , "David S. Miller" , David Daney , Michael Ellerman , Jan Glauber , Jason Baron , the arch/x86 maintainers , Xen Devel , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Jeremy Fitzhardinge List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 10/18/2011 04:02 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-15 at 18:52 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >> On 10/15/2011 01:42 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 14:51 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >>>> How about this? Proper comment and much earlier init. >>> Looks good to me, thanks! >> Should I take that as an ACK on the series? > Yes, I don't see any problems with it, > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra How should this go upstream? Should I submit it, or does someone else want to do it? Thanks, J