From: grinberg@compulab.co.il (Igor Grinberg) Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:01:34 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] omap_hsmmc: add pm_caps field In-Reply-To: References: <1321970539-7104-1-git-send-email-eliad@wizery.com> <1321970539-7104-2-git-send-email-eliad@wizery.com> <4ED35131.6020206@compulab.co.il> Message-ID: <4ED35BFE.9060202@compulab.co.il> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 11/28/11 11:23, Eliad Peller wrote: > hi Igor, > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Igor Grinberg wrote: >> On 11/22/11 16:02, Eliad Peller wrote: >>> Add pm_caps field to omap2_hsmmc_info and omap_mmc_slot_data >>> structs, so we will be able to indicate mmc pm capabilities >>> in the board file. >> >> Shouldn't this be user space runtime controllable? >> Instead of being a static per board decision? >> > we only declare here support for the pm capabilities. > the actual configuration of these capabilities is done at a later > stage, and can be controlled (implicitly) by userspace (e.g. by > enabling Wakeup-On-Wireless for the wl12xx chip). This is good to hear, because patch 1/3 makes it look like the bus power does get immediately affected depending on that capability, isn't it? -- Regards, Igor.