From: James Hogan Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] asm-generic/unistd.h: handle symbol prefixes in cond_syscall Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:56:03 +0000 Message-ID: <4F47C123.9050009@imgtec.com> References: <4F47981F.4020305@imgtec.com> <201202241119.44480.vapier@gentoo.org> <201202241637.30284.arnd@arndb.de> <201202241638.12205.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from multi.imgtec.com ([194.200.65.239]:47662 "EHLO multi.imgtec.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757875Ab2BXQ4F (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Feb 2012 11:56:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <201202241638.12205.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Mike Frysinger , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel On 24/02/12 16:38, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 24 February 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> We actually have MODULE_SYMBOL_PREFIX providing the correct string >> under a name that is not appropriate here. We can probably stick with >> Jason's patch for now and add a more sophisticated logic if another >> user of CONFIG_SYMBOL_PREFIX comes up. >> >> So for Jason's patch: >> >> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann >> >> We could put that into the kernel now, but it's probably sufficient if >> Jason keeps the patch with his others and submits it at the same time >> when we get there. > > Sorry, I meant s/Jason/James/g np. Okay, I'll keep hold of it. Thanks James