From: shubhrajyoti@ti.com (Shubhrajyoti) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:59:22 +0530 Subject: [PATCHv8 09/10] I2C: OMAP: Do not set the XUDF if the underflow is not reached In-Reply-To: <20120423164212.GC27321@pengutronix.de> References: <1334842101-20670-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com> <1334842101-20670-10-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com> <20120423164212.GC27321@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <4F959172.7080302@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Monday 23 April 2012 10:12 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 06:58:20PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote: >> Currently in the 1.153 errata handling while waiting for transmitter >> underflow if NACK is got the XUDF flag is also set. >> The flag is set after wait for the condition is over. > What does XUDF mean? Please update the commit description, I can't know > all terminology for all architectures. > Transmitter underflow ,will update the commit description and resend.