From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:07:41 +0200 Subject: [GIT PULL] net/at91: at91_ether fixes for 3.4-rc In-Reply-To: <20120426.052006.1832921763623188173.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4F991210.8060409@atmel.com> <20120426.052006.1832921763623188173.davem@davemloft.net> Message-ID: <4F991E6D.4020303@atmel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 04/26/2012 11:20 AM, David Miller : > From: Nicolas Ferre > Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:14:56 +0200 > >> Can you please pull those fixes for 3.4-rc? The ARM/AT91 part >> of modifications is pretty small and bounded to a single SoC so >> it will not mess with arm-soc git tree. > > Please post the patches themselves to netdev. > > You can give me pull requests, but those go into the "[PATCH 0/N] ..." > email, it doesn't preclude you're still having to post the actual > patches. > > Otherwise nobody can review your work. Both patches have been posted on netdev (but independently): First has been posted on February 13th: http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg188868.html With a question from myself a few days ago: http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg196183.html And I can find ancestors back in May 2011... Second one has been posted on April 23rd: http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg196002.html So, should I repost both of them as patch series? Best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre