From: b32955@freescale.com (Huang Shijie) Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 10:39:07 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v3] mtd: gpmi: add device tree support for mx6q and mx28 In-Reply-To: References: <1335939209-15625-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> <20120502144008.GF2194@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <1336042485.13013.41.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> <4FA33B7A.3040504@freescale.com> Message-ID: <4FA3414B.3050302@freescale.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org ? 2012?05?04? 10:28, Shawn Guo ??: > On 4 May 2012 10:14, Huang Shijie wrote: >> The mxs-dma is another driver (just as the pinctrl driver). I think it's >> better to do the job in parallel. >> > The problem is if the patch gets applied on mtd tree as it is, the > gpmi-nand will stop functioning on mtd tree. Or you are fine with even this patch is get applied. the gpmi-nand still can not work. I still have to add the pinctl patch to it. So it have no difference on whether the mxs-dma driver is ready or not. :) So let it go in parallel. Best Regards Huang Shijie > that, since no in-tree board support is using the driver so far? If > you are fine with that, I'm fine too. > > Regards, > Shawn >