From: shubhrajyoti@ti.com (Shubhrajyoti) Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 15:29:18 +0530 Subject: [PATCHv9 02/10] I2C: OMAP: Fix the mismatch of pm_runtime enable and disable In-Reply-To: <87wr3zkjp7.fsf@ti.com> References: <1335969135-20858-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com> <1335969135-20858-3-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com> <87wr3zkjp7.fsf@ti.com> Message-ID: <4FC34C76.402@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Saturday 26 May 2012 03:27 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Looks right. > > Can you be more specific in the changelog about when the errors/warning > happens? By the way the count cribs Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable! is what happens. I found it by review, I did the testing with this patch. Since there was an access without get_sync I was seeing some other issues. Did not test with the fix and without this patch. > e.g. why pm_runtime_enable() is called again? Is this on > module unload/reload? > > Other than that > > Acked-by: Kevin Hilman Thanks.