From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren) Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 11:34:48 -0600 Subject: [PATCH REPOST 1/2] mmc: tegra: use bus-width property instead of support-8bit In-Reply-To: <20120606135647.GA3423@void.printf.net> References: <1338834755-6900-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <20120606135647.GA3423@void.printf.net> Message-ID: <4FCF94B8.6000400@wwwdotorg.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 06/06/2012 07:56 AM, Chris Ball wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 12:32:34PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: >> From: Stephen Warren >> >> Update the driver to parse the new unified bus-width property introduced >> in commit 7f21779 "mmc: dt: Consolidate DT bindings", instead of the legacy >> support-8bit property. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren >> --- >> Chris, It's probably easiest conflict-wise if I take this through the Tegra >> tree. (Note: When I posted this series before, I said there shouldn't be any >> conflicts if you take them through the MMC tree. That's probably still true, >> but unforseen future conflicts seem more likely in the .dts files in the >> second patch than sdhci-tegra.c in this patch, so the Tegra tree may make >> more sense). Since the second patch depends on the first, it's easiest if >> these go in through the same tree. Does this sound OK? > > Yes, makes sense -- taking this via the Tegra tree is fine: > > Acked-by: Chris Ball Thanks. I have applied the series.