Return-Path: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys010amx135.postini.com [74.125.245.135]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FE246B031F for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 04:48:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FE82555.2010704@parallels.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 12:46:13 +0400 From: Glauber Costa MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: RFC: Easy-Reclaimable LRU list References: <4FE012CD.6010605@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <4FE012CD.6010605@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Minchan Kim Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , LKML , Rik van Riel , Mel Gorman , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , KOSAKI Motohiro , Johannes Weiner , Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Morton , Anton Vorontsov , John Stultz , Pekka Enberg , Wu Fengguang , Hugh Dickins On 06/19/2012 09:49 AM, Minchan Kim wrote: > Hi everybody! > > Recently, there are some efforts to handle system memory pressure. > > 1) low memory notification - [1] > 2) fallocate(VOLATILE) - [2] > 3) fadvise(NOREUSE) - [3] > > For them, I would like to add new LRU list, aka "Ereclaimable" which is opposite of "unevictable". > Reclaimable LRU list includes_easy_ reclaimable pages. > For example, easy reclaimable pages are following as. > > 1. invalidated but remained LRU list. > 2. pageout pages for reclaim(PG_reclaim pages) > 3. fadvise(NOREUSE) > 4. fallocate(VOLATILE) > > Their pages shouldn't stir normal LRU list and compaction might not migrate them, even. What about other things moving memory like CMA ? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org