From: Jan Kiszka Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6 v5] deal with guest panicked event accoring to -onpanic parameter Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 08:45:29 +0200 Message-ID: <4FF29509.3030909@siemens.com> References: <4FEAAE6E.7070302@cn.fujitsu.com> <4FEAAFFF.40401@cn.fujitsu.com> <4FEB1B06.4050309@siemens.com> <4FEBB044.1000306@cn.fujitsu.com> <4FEC153B.6040300@siemens.com> <4FF28C17.703@cn.fujitsu.com> <4FF292D5.20403@siemens.com> <4FF29482.6050206@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm list , qemu-devel , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Avi Kivity , "Daniel P. Berrange" , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Gleb Natapov To: Wen Congyang Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4FF29482.6050206@cn.fujitsu.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 2012-07-03 08:43, Wen Congyang wrote: >> I'm not talking about changing the interface to the guest, I'm talking >> about how to model it in QEMU. And that difference would be transparent >> to the guest. I pointed you to examples like hw/kvm/clock.c. > > OK, I will read the code in hw/kvm/clock.c Just to avoid confusion: That example is just good for a trivial framework. It does vmstate saving, something you don't need as your "device" is stateless. If you want to find out how to register PIO ranges, also check e.g. hw/pcspk.c. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux