Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49162) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Um42C-0007nL-L4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:29:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Um42B-0004iL-B1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:29:28 -0400 Message-ID: <51B5F0D3.2030504@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 19:29:23 +0400 From: Michael Tokarev MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <51B5EE24.5010400@msgid.tls.msk.ru> In-Reply-To: <51B5EE24.5010400@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH v1 1/3] char/serial: cosmetic fixes. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, edgar.iglesias@gmail.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org 10.06.2013 19:17, Michael Tokarev =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > 03.06.2013 09:12, peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com wrote: >> From: Peter Crosthwaite >> >> Some cosmetic fixes to char/serial fixing some checkpatch errors. >=20 > These are all cosmetic fixes indeed. I weren't sure we're > applying stylistic changes by its own. But apparently > people don't object so I don't see why not, either, except > that I don't really want to open a can of worms with other > stylistic patches to come ;) >=20 > Applied all 3 to the trivial patches queue. Actually I didn't apply these. Since patch 2/3 weren't sent to -trivial, and 3/3 does not apply without it, I'm not sure I want to apply either of these. Maybe all 3 should be sent to the same tree? Should I pick the 2/3 too, which wasn't submitted to -trivial? Thank you! /mjt