From: James Hogan Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix more issues with generic pinconf bindings Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:16:19 +0100 Message-ID: <51C99823.1060503@imgtec.com> References: <201306251455.01540.heiko@sntech.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201306251455.01540.heiko@sntech.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: =?UTF-8?B?SGVpa28gU3TDvGJuZXI=?= Cc: Linus Walleij , Stephen Warren , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Grant Likely , Rob Herring List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 25/06/13 13:55, Heiko St=C3=BCbner wrote: > As Stephen Warren pointed out, some pinconf bindings had deficits > either in documentation or in the whole thought process. >=20 > Therefore this series tries to fix these issues by improving > documentation and removing the real controversial bindings for now. >=20 > Of the changed pinconf bindings only the slew-rate had an acutal > current user (since yesterday). James I hope it's ok to simply > remove the slew-rate handling from the tz1090 driver until we can > handle it correctly in dt. Other than my comment about patch 3 (which since it's the only case I don't mind too much, it can easily be added back again in the future): Reviewed-by: James Hogan Cheers James