From: rnayak@ti.com (Rajendra Nayak) Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 11:13:04 +0530 Subject: [RFC 0/4] Cleanup PRM and CM regbit headers In-Reply-To: References: <1372076143-12955-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <20130625071428.GC5523@atomide.com> <51C95839.6050307@ti.com> <20130704115819.GJ5523@atomide.com> <51D56743.9080800@ti.com> Message-ID: <51D65CE8.4050004@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thursday 04 July 2013 10:14 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > You mentioned that these patches were generated with some kind of awk/grep > scripting. Can you integrate that in an automated way into the > autogeneration flow? If the answer is yes, then keep the header. If the > answer is no, then the header should be dropped. Beno?t, maybe you have > an opinion too? Ok, I'll try and integrate those scripts so all this can be done in an automated way even for newer SoCs. > > As far as whether this should go in -rcX or not, my view is that, as a > matter of policy, large changes like this should wait until v3.12. Now, > having written that, I also was under the impression that the OMAP5 > changes weren't going to be sent upstream unless the total diffstat would > be balanced to roughly zero or negative lines. As far as I know, that > didn't happen. So I guess, v3.11-rc it is... kernel development by > diffstat :-( I don't mind these going in -rcX or 3.12, either way is fine. > > Finally, please repost the whole series once you're done with your > changes, as a non-RFC, along with your pull request (if you plan to send > one). I guess I should be the one to take these, since I wound up taking > the OMAP5 addition... :) I thought so too that you should be the one sending the pull. I will post these out as non-RFC after I do a clean integration into the autogen scripts, and then you can take a call on sending the pull for either -rcX or 3.12