From: Gu Zheng Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] fs/anon_inode: Introduce a new lib function anon_inode_getfile_private() Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:15:38 +0800 Message-ID: <51E5F03A.4060508@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <51E518BC.8040900@cn.fujitsu.com> <20130716131614.GC5403@kvack.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , Al Viro , tangchen , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel , linux-kernel , Yasuaki Ishimatsu To: Benjamin LaHaise Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130716131614.GC5403@kvack.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Hi Ben, On 07/16/2013 09:16 PM, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:56:12PM +0800, Gu Zheng wrote: >> >> Introduce a new lib function anon_inode_getfile_private(), it creates a new file >> instance by hooking it up to an anonymous inode, and a dentry that describe the >> "class" of the file, similar to anon_inode_getfile(), but each file holds a >> single inode. Furthermore, anyone who wants to create a private anon file will >> benefit from this change. >> >> Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng >> Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise > > Please don't add my Signed-off-by when I have never even seen or reviewed > a patch -- that is completely unacceptable. Sorry for my reckless action, I'll remember your reminder.:) > Second, I don't think this > patch is suitable for 3.11, as it has not seen much testing outside of one > test program I had written. It's a long standing bug, so it isn't urgent > to get the fix into the tree. That said, it did pass a few tests I ran > last night, so it is probably suitable for the -next tree. Thanks for your test.:) Regards, Gu > > As for patch 1, it looks okay to me, but will need Al Viro's signoff. > > -ben -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org