From: afzal@ti.com (Afzal Mohammed) Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 17:39:13 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v2 00/13] ARM: OMAP2+: AM43x PRCM support In-Reply-To: <52133482.7080405@baylibre.com> References: <20130813080159.GT7656@atomide.com> <5211BD07.9090309@ti.com> <52133482.7080405@baylibre.com> Message-ID: <521DE869.6020503@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Benoit, On Tuesday 20 August 2013 02:48 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote: > Otherwise, I guess that most of these patches should be non-intrusive > for other OMAPs beside that one (ARM: OMAP2+: CM: reintroduce SW_SLEEP > for OMAP4). And for the moment, that's maybe the most important point. > > Have you checked that it will not generate any regression for OMAP4 in > term of PM features: suspend, cpuidle at least? As noted by Rajendra, there could problem where clockdomain doesn't have SW_SLEEP and only have HW_AUTO. I have to rework the relevant patch to handle it properly. Regards Afzal