From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren) Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 11:42:17 -0700 Subject: [RFC PATCH V2 2/2] kbuild: dtbs_install: new make target In-Reply-To: <20131119122801.GL16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1384201760-16785-1-git-send-email-jason@lakedaemon.net> <528A65DF.8060000@wwwdotorg.org> <20131118191955.GG10335@titan.lakedaemon.net> <528A6944.3070303@wwwdotorg.org> <20131118192852.GI10335@titan.lakedaemon.net> <528A6CA3.9030904@wwwdotorg.org> <20131118195243.GJ10335@titan.lakedaemon.net> <528A98C8.9040803@wwwdotorg.org> <20131119122801.GL16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <528BB109.2060201@wwwdotorg.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 11/19/2013 05:28 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 03:46:32PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: >> Again, the point is not that it's hard to write the script. As you >> demonstrated, it's easy. The problem is that then, everybody has to do >> something different for Tegra, forever. No matter how small the actual >> cost of doing it is, it's still non-scalable to require that everyone >> know about this special case. I'm not convinced the issue would be >> isolated to Tegra either. > > That's why there's the facility to allow an override to the script, > just like there's the facility to override the default script when > running "make install". Again, you are completely missing the point about that not scaling at all. But I will go and investigate what it takes to support renaming the DTBs. Everyone (using Tegra) will have to update their bootloader, but perhaps that can be dealt with.