Message-ID: <52D69BD9.9010901@...1856...>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:31:53 +0100
From: Steffan Karger <steffan@...1856...>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20140113185822.GV226@...1296...>	<52D51737.1040201@...1114...>
	<52D5A65F.2060807@...1227...>
	<20140115082942.GN226@...1296...>
In-Reply-To: <20140115082942.GN226@...1296...>
Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] RFD: <net/route.h> and struct route (trac #340)
List-Id: <openvpn-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel>, 
	<mailto:openvpn-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=openvpn-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:openvpn-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel>, 
	<mailto:openvpn-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Hi,

On 15-01-14 09:29, Gert Doering wrote:
> My current "rules" for application to release/2.3 are:
>  - changes important for long-term usability of 2.3
>    (I think the main examples are TLS version negotiation & PolarSSL 1.2)

I'd say this patch qualifies for release/2.3 according to this rule (and
I agree with the rule), so I vote for applying this to release/2.3 too.

-Steffan