From: t.figa@samsung.com (Tomasz Figa)
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 11:04:41 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v7 1/3] ARM: EXYNOS: initial board support for exynos5260
 SoC
In-Reply-To: <CAK9yfHzuVZh-RhfT+0tEehnF+aWnYHG=X2cv_E6uvzq2aS7UQg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1396519224-18712-1-git-send-email-rahul.sharma@samsung.com>
 <1396519224-18712-2-git-send-email-rahul.sharma@samsung.com>
 <CAK9yfHzuVZh-RhfT+0tEehnF+aWnYHG=X2cv_E6uvzq2aS7UQg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <53450D29.7020207@samsung.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 07.04.2014 10:38, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
>
> On 3 April 2014 15:30, Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@samsung.com> wrote:
>> From: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
>>
>> This patch add basic arch side support for exynos5260 SoC.
> <snip>
>
>> @@ -374,6 +374,7 @@ static char const *exynos_dt_compat[] __initconst = {
>>          "samsung,exynos4412",
>>          "samsung,exynos5",
>>          "samsung,exynos5250",
>> +       "samsung,exynos5260",
>
> I don't think we should be adding this as we do not yet have any soc
> specific quirk.
> Compatibility to generic string, "samsung,exynos5"  should be sufficient.
>

Yes. Unless a SoC specific quirk that needs to be handled at such low 
level stage emerges, there is no need to add such compatible string to 
the kernel.

Best regards,
Tomasz