From: t.figa@samsung.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 10:49:14 +0200 Subject: [PATCH V4 10/20] ARM: exynos: cpuidle: Move clock setup to pm.c In-Reply-To: <5347A816.4020609@linaro.org> References: <1397123751-1957-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <1397123751-1957-11-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <5346A367.2070107@samsung.com> <5346A958.1030302@linaro.org> <5346BA09.9020708@samsung.com> <5347A816.4020609@linaro.org> Message-ID: <5347AC8A.7090006@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 11.04.2014 10:30, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 04/10/2014 05:34 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: >> On 10.04.2014 16:23, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>> On 04/10/2014 03:57 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: >>>> Hi Daniel, >>>> >>>> On 10.04.2014 11:55, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>>>> One more step is moving the clock ratio setting at idle time in pm.c >>>>> >>>>> The macro names have been changed to be consistent with the other >>>>> macros >>>>> name in the file. >>>>> >>>>> Note, the clock divider was working only when cpuidle was enabled >>>>> because it >>>>> was in its init routine. With this change, the clock divider is set in >>>>> the pm's >>>>> init routine, so it will also operate when the cpuidle driver is not >>>>> set, which >>>>> is good. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano >>>>> Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar >>>>> Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz >>>>> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa >>>>> --- >>>>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c | 54 >>>>> --------------------------------------- >>>>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h | 19 ++++++++++++++ >>>>> 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> Sorry that I didn't mention that before, but now I recall that there >>>> was >>>> already a similar patch moving this code to Exynos5250 clock driver, >>>> which is the best place for setup of any CMU registers and a step >>>> towards removing one more static IO mapping. >>> >>> Yes, Bartlomiej mentioned it. >>> >>> Is it possible to merge this mentioned patch or to give a pointer to it >>> so I can integrate it into the patchset ? >> >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=138147021207626&w=2 >> >> I wonder if it still applies cleanly, though... > > Ok, if I refer to the date, this patch has been lost in the limbus. So I > can integrate it with my patchset without conflicting with any tree. > Right ? > As I suspected, it doesn't apply onto current sources. I have attached a rebased version. Feel free to send it as a part of next version of your series. Best regards, Tomasz -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-ARM-EXYNOS-Move-arm-core-power-down-clock-to-exynos5.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 6226 bytes Desc: not available URL: