From: t.figa@samsung.com (Tomasz Figa) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 18:00:53 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: Fix PL330 MDMA clock assignment for Exynos4x12 In-Reply-To: <1397226211-29775-1-git-send-email-s.nawrocki@samsung.com> References: <1397226211-29775-1-git-send-email-s.nawrocki@samsung.com> Message-ID: <534811B5.10906@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Sylwester, On 11.04.2014 16:23, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > Exynos4212/4412 has different clock for the PL330 MDMA, ensure > the clock is properly assigned for these newer SoCs. > > Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki > Acked-by: Kyungmin Park > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4x12.dtsi | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4x12.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4x12.dtsi > index c4a9306..19589c6 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4x12.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4x12.dtsi > @@ -243,4 +243,10 @@ > clock-names = "biu", "ciu"; > status = "disabled"; > }; > + > + amba { > + mdma at 12850000 { > + clocks = <&clock CLK_MDMA2>; > + }; > + }; > }; > Since the ID for CLK_MDMA2 was added mistakenly, instead of reusing CLK_MDMA and it was not used by any device tree files anyway, I believe the better fix would be to simply change the clock definition in Exynos 4 clock driver to use CLK_MDMA for both SoC families. Best regards, Tomasz