From: Heinrich Schuchardt Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 1/6] fanotify: enable close-on-exec on events' fd when requested in fanotify_init() Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 22:57:23 +0200 Message-ID: <542481B3.8070300@gmx.de> References: <9d050a2db4f9cf68cd6cb038f16cccb0f73c6e66.1411562410.git.ydroneaud@opteya.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <9d050a2db4f9cf68cd6cb038f16cccb0f73c6e66.1411562410.git.ydroneaud-RlY5vtjFyJ3QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Yann Droneaud Cc: Eric Paris , Richard Guy Briggs , Al Viro , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Jan Kara List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org On 24.09.2014 15:11, Yann Droneaud wrote: > According to commit 80af258867648 ('fanotify: groups can specify > their f_flags for new fd'), file descriptors created as part of > file access notification events inherit flags from the > event_f_flags argument passed to syscall fanotify_init(2). > > So while it is legal for userspace to call fanotify_init() with > O_CLOEXEC as part of its second argument, O_CLOEXEC is currently > silently ignored. > > Indeed event_f_flags are only given to dentry_open(), which only > seems to care about O_ACCMODE and O_PATH in do_dentry_open(), > O_DIRECT in open_check_o_direct() and O_LARGEFILE in > generic_file_open(). I tested on kernel 3.17.0-rc5. I passed O_CLOEXEC in event_f_flags. When I called fcnt(event_metadata->fd, F_GETFD) it did not return FD_CLOEXEC. So I can confirm your observation that O_CLOEXEC is not working as expected. I found this definition #define get_unused_fd() get_unused_fd_flags(0) So essentially when get_unused_fd() is called for a fanotify event O_CLOEXEC is ignored. This is what your patch fixes. > > More, there's no effective check on event_f_flags value that > would catch unknown / unsupported values, unlike the one on > f_flags argument of the syscall (see FAN_ALL_INIT_FLAGS in > include/uapi/linux/fanotify.h). The fanotify_init(2) man page describes which flags are allowable in event_f_flags. Could you, please, explain why the following code in fanotify_user.c is not to be considered an effective check: if (event_f_flags & ~FANOTIFY_INIT_ALL_EVENT_F_BITS) return -EINVAL; switch (event_f_flags & O_ACCMODE) { case O_RDONLY: case O_RDWR: case O_WRONLY: break; default: return -EINVAL; } I CC Jan Kara as he reviewed the code. Best regards Heinrich Schuchardt