Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48000) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xgv4K-0002PL-Iq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 08:31:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xgv4D-0004o1-AN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 08:31:12 -0400 Message-ID: <5447A374.4070309@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:30:44 +0800 From: Gonglei MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201410221945053926307@sangfor.com> <54479C3E.1070803@huawei.com> <54479C8A.9000407@redhat.com> <54479CE5.7040406@redhat.com> <5447A151.2050000@huawei.com> <5447A1E1.7030102@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5447A1E1.7030102@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] snapshot: use local variable to bdrv_pwrite_sync L1 table List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Max Reitz Cc: qemu-trivial , Kevin Wolf , Zhang Haoyu , qemu-devel , Stefan Hajnoczi On 2014/10/22 20:24, Max Reitz wrote: > On 2014-10-22 at 14:21, Gonglei wrote: >> On 2014/10/22 20:02, Max Reitz wrote: >> >>> On 2014-10-22 at 14:01, Max Reitz wrote: >>>> On 2014-10-22 at 13:59, Gonglei wrote: >>>>> On 2014/10/22 19:45, Zhang Haoyu wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Use local variable to bdrv_pwrite_sync L1 table, >>>>>> needless to make conversion of cached L1 table between >>>>>> big-endian and host style. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Haoyu >>>>>> Reviewed-by: Max Reitz >>>>>> --- >>>>>> v3 -> v4: >>>>>> - convert local L1 table to host-style before copy it >>>>>> back to s->l1_table >>>>>> >>>>>> v2 -> v3: >>>>>> - replace g_try_malloc0 with qemu_try_blockalign >>>>>> - copy the latest local L1 table back to s->l1_table >>>>>> after successfully bdrv_pwrite_sync L1 table >>>>>> >>>>>> v1 -> v2: >>>>>> - remove the superflous assignment, l1_table = NULL; >>>>>> - replace 512 with BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, and align_offset with ROUND_UP >>>>>> - remove needless check of if (l1_table) before g_free(l1_table) >>>>>> >>>>>> block/qcow2-refcount.c | 28 ++++++++++++---------------- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/block/qcow2-refcount.c b/block/qcow2-refcount.c >>>>>> index 2bcaaf9..3e4050a 100644 >>>>>> --- a/block/qcow2-refcount.c >>>>>> +++ b/block/qcow2-refcount.c >>>>>> @@ -881,14 +881,17 @@ int >>>>>> qcow2_update_snapshot_refcount(BlockDriverState *bs, >>>>>> { >>>>>> BDRVQcowState *s = bs->opaque; >>>>>> uint64_t *l1_table, *l2_table, l2_offset, offset, l1_size2; >>>>>> - bool l1_allocated = false; >>>>>> int64_t old_offset, old_l2_offset; >>>>>> int i, j, l1_modified = 0, nb_csectors, refcount; >>>>>> int ret; >>>>>> l2_table = NULL; >>>>>> - l1_table = NULL; >>>>>> l1_size2 = l1_size * sizeof(uint64_t); >>>>>> + l1_table = qemu_try_blockalign(bs->file, l1_size2); >>>>>> + if (l1_size2 && l1_table == NULL) { >>>>> I think this check has a logic problem. If l1_size2 != 0 and >>>>> l1_table == NULL, >>>>> What will happen? >>>> Then this condition is met and you return with -ENOMEM...? >>> Oh, but I see something different: qemu_try_blockalign() never returns >>> NULL, not even when you request 0 bytes. >> >> Yes. But if l1_size2 is zero, will waste memory or some other problems. >> Please see below: >> >> the original code: >> l1_table = g_try_malloc0(align_offset(0, 512)); >> -> l1_table = g_try_malloc0(0) >> so l1_table == NULL. >> >> after this patch: >> l1_table = qemu_try_blockalign(bs->file, 0) >> l1_table will not be NULL. > > Okay, so you meant "if l1_size2 == 0 and l1_table != NULL". > Hum, sorry for my typo ;) >> I don't know whether l1_size2 can be zero or not. > > Probably not, but if it cannot be zero, testing for that case makes even > less sense. > So, can we add a check at the begin of this function? Best regards, -Gonglei