From: Gustavo Zacarias Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:26:41 -0300 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] aircrack-ng: security bump to version 1.2-rc1 In-Reply-To: <87d28tmnwz.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> References: <1415734946-3492-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> <87bnodo5p9.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> <54627093.3050103@zacarias.com.ar> <87d28tmnwz.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <54627F11.8090409@zacarias.com.ar> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 11/11/2014 06:23 PM, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > I don't think we need to spend a lot of effort on building something > like this statically if upstream doesn't really support it. I wouldn't > have any problems with making it depend on !STATIC. aircrack-ng upstream has been receptive of my patch(es) so far and the problem lies with libnl*.pc to be precise which doesn't define Libs.private at all even though it uses libm and libpthread for example. I just need some time and will to fix that in a proper way. On aircrack's side it uses pkg-config so it's mostly clean. Regards.