From: s.nawrocki@samsung.com (Sylwester Nawrocki)
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:19:49 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/2] ARM: EXYNOS: PMU: move restart code into pmu driver
In-Reply-To: <1416307650-15162-3-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
References: <1416307650-15162-1-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
 <1416307650-15162-3-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
Message-ID: <546B6395.8020403@samsung.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 18/11/14 11:47, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c
> index 6c8a76d..e4c3512 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pmu.c
> @@ -11,8 +11,11 @@

> @@ -716,6 +719,13 @@ static void exynos5420_pmu_init(void)
>  	pr_info("EXYNOS5420 PMU initialized\n");
>  }
>  
> +static int pmu_restart_notify(struct notifier_block *this,
> +		unsigned long code, void *unused)
> +{
> +	pmu_raw_writel(0x1, EXYNOS_SWRESET);

Is it also valid on exynos5440 ? Doesn't it cause any harm there ?
Perhaps we could add a comment saying it has not effect on that SoC ?

> +	return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +}

--
Thanks,
Sylwester