From: hauke@hauke-m.de (Hauke Mehrtens) Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 19:37:49 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: BCM5301X: Fix chip typo in ARCH_BCM_5301X help message In-Reply-To: <1431501645-3887-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> References: <1431501645-3887-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> Message-ID: <55538BED.4070504@hauke-m.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 05/13/2015 09:20 AM, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote: > Signed-off-by: Rafa? Mi?ecki > --- > arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig > index 8b11f44..7fec7e8 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig > @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ config ARCH_BCM_5301X > BCM53014, BCM53015, BCM53016, BCM53017, BCM53018, BCM4707, > BCM4708 and BCM4709. > > - Do not confuse this with the BCM4760 which is a totally > + Do not confuse this with the BCM4706 which is a totally > different SoC or with the older BCM47XX and BCM53XX based > network SoC using a MIPS CPU, they are supported by arch/mips/bcm47xx > > Nack Like Florian said this is not a typo. There is a BCM4760 SoC and it was or is supported by Linux. See this for BCM4760: https://lwn.net/Articles/563957/ I forgot about this at first too. Nice naming Broadcom. (the other companies are not better). ;-) Hauke