From: k.kozlowski@samsung.com (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 15:26:29 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: Add BUS1 instance pinctrl support
In-Reply-To: <55F66641.6010209@samsung.com>
References: <1440761134-27639-1-git-send-email-alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
 <55E3E95D.50003@samsung.com> <55F6563A.2030107@samsung.com>
 <55F6606F.3090000@samsung.com> <55F66641.6010209@samsung.com>
Message-ID: <55F66895.7030902@samsung.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 14.09.2015 15:16, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On 09/14/2015 11:21 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 14.09.2015 14:08, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On 08/31/2015 11:12 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 28.08.2015 20:25, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>>>>> This adds BUS1 instance pinctrl for exynos7 soc.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7-pinctrl.dtsi |  111
>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi         |    7 ++
>>>>>    2 files changed, 118 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> The "etc1" GPIO in my datasheet is not fully documented but the rest
>>>> looks good:
>>>>
>>> Ok will send v2 and remove etc1 gpio node.
>>
>> You don't have to. I mentioned it only for reference that I cannot
>> review the etc GPIO node because it is not mentioned in my datasheet.
>> However you may have different (e.g. newer) datasheet and etc1 could be
>> documented there.
>>
> Sorry for delay, I check two versions of the UM and unfortunately both
> show incomplete entries for etc1, my downstream code has these changes
> though.
>> I applied the first version of patch some time ago (your response is
>> after two weeks). Do you want me to replace it with v2?
>>
> Please consider taking my v2 which I just posted.
> Thanks again.

Okay, I'll replace the patch with v2.

Best regards,
Krzysztof