From: SF Markus Elfring Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 06:17:46 +0000 Subject: Re: net-ipv6: Delete unnecessary checks before the function call "kfree_skb" Message-Id: <5648238A.20109@users.sourceforge.net> List-Id: References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net> <530A086E.8010901@users.sourceforge.net> <530A72AA.3000601@users.sourceforge.net> <530B5FB6.6010207@users.sourceforge.net> <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net> <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <564785ED.1040906@users.sourceforge.net> <1447558345.22599.64.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> In-Reply-To: <1447558345.22599.64.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov , "David S. Miller" , Hideaki Yoshfuji , James Morris , Jozsef Kadlecsik , Pablo Neira Ayuso , Patrick McHardy , netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall > While if the test is done in kfree_skb(), the branch predictor of the > cpu wont be able to predict things. > > By feeding too many NULL pointers to kfree_skb(), we slow down it. Would it make sense to annotate checks before such function calls as "UNLIKELY"? Regards, Markus