From: j.anaszewski@samsung.com (Jacek Anaszewski) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:36:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] leds/pwm: fix driver description and make license match the header In-Reply-To: <20151119191737.GF22022@pengutronix.de> References: <1385412225-29740-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <1385412225-29740-4-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20151119191737.GF22022@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <564EE9B4.3010404@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Uwe, Applied, thanks. Best Regards, Jacek Anaszewski On 11/19/2015 08:17 PM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > Hello, > > while the other two patches in this thread are controversal, this one > shouldn't. It still sits in my branch with unapplied patches since > nearly two years, which is enormous considering it's such an easy patch. > > Best regards > Uwe > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 09:43:45PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig >> --- >> drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c >> index cdc3e4d..0796ca3 100644 >> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c >> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c >> @@ -239,6 +239,6 @@ static struct platform_driver led_pwm_driver = { >> module_platform_driver(led_pwm_driver); >> >> MODULE_AUTHOR("Luotao Fu "); >> -MODULE_DESCRIPTION("PWM LED driver for PXA"); >> -MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); >> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("generic PWM LED driver"); >> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); >> MODULE_ALIAS("platform:leds-pwm"); >> -- >> 1.8.4.2 >> >> >