Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/64] 3.10.97-stable review
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20160214222221.031471863@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	shuah.kh@samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Message-ID: <56C1F2BA.7090209@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 07:46:02 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160214222221.031471863@linuxfoundation.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org

On 02/14/2016 02:22 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.97 release.
> There are 64 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Tue Feb 16 22:22:07 UTC 2016.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>

Build results:
	total: 122 pass: 120 fail: 2
Failed builds:
	i386:allyesconfig
	x86_64:allyesconfig

Qemu test results:
	total: 72 pass: 72 fail: 0

Details are available at http://kerneltests.org/builders.

As mentioned separately, dropping 'EVM: Use crypto_memneq() for digest
comparison' should fix the problem.

Guenter